UFT Mind
Why UFT Mind exists
I'm Tank. I'm not a scientist. No formal training, no lab, no credentials to point to. I've known about this stuff for years, just from watching videos online, and there was never much real information out there beyond the surface level. I always thought it would be cool if this was real and I could actually do it one day. That turned into an actual urge to just try it and see for myself instead of only wondering about it. I started with a Muse headband, the most accessible real EEG device out there, and I'm hoping to upgrade to something like the Neurosity Crown down the line. Somehow I ended up here, with more questions than answers, and about two months of real, dated sessions to show for it, as of writing this, and still counting.
Here's what I actually have: about two months of real, honest sessions, dated, logged the same day. Real EEG data from a Muse headband, checked against what I actually reported feeling. Hits and misses both left in. Nothing quietly dropped just because it made me look better.
Should be honest here too: details do get filled in a little when I sit down to actually write a session up, that's true of anyone remembering anything. But I've learned I've got a genuinely good memory for this, maybe better than average, and the important stuff, the gate zero call, the physical markers, the EEG itself, gets captured close enough to real time that it isn't relying on memory alone. And if I catch myself connecting something to another memory, or notice I might just be making a detail up to fill a gap instead of actually recalling it, I leave that part out rather than write it down like it was real. Better to have a gap in the record than a detail I can't actually stand behind.
Why I'm actually doing this
I'm not trying to prove remote viewing or out of body experience is real. That's not the claim. The real claim is smaller than that, and more honest: there's a real, physical, repeatable EEG signature behind whatever it is I'm doing, a state that doesn't match ordinary waking or ordinary sleep, and that's true whether or not anyone believes the content itself is real. EEG doesn't lie. Believe I can do this or don't, the data behind it is real either way.
There's a bigger reason too. A lot of the source material out there, old government programs, different practitioners, different eras, gets treated like it's all one thing. It's not. Structured protocol, freeform sessions, automatic writing, cold impressions, deep altered states: these are genuinely different channels, and they keep getting lumped together and compared like they're the same experiment. Some of that confusion goes all the way back to how the government itself handled this material. I've put real time into going through that side of it myself, the actual declassified documents and the people who were part of those programs, not to take any of it at face value, but to actually try to make heads or tails of what it might really be, and just as honestly, what it might not be. Untangling that mess honestly, with real separated data instead of vibes, is part of the actual point of this project.
And under both of those reasons: I want to understand this myself. Not just have an experience and move on. Build a real log of what's actually knowable about it. EEG, writing style, session patterns, whatever's actually checkable. We may never fully answer what this is. That's fine. That was never the bar. The bar is having a genuinely solid record of what we can understand, even if the biggest question never gets answered at all.
Why this stays honest even when it's inconvenient
Here's the clearest example of what "honest" actually means to me. For most of my first two months, a falling sensation right before something happened felt like a bad sign, like the attempt was failing, like I was just falling asleep. That's the ordinary, reasonable read anyone would have. It took a lot of repetition before the record showed the opposite: that exact sensation was the actual trigger, every time, no exceptions. I didn't throw out the old read and pretend I always knew better. It's logged both ways, what I used to think it meant, and what it turned out to actually mean, and why I was wrong the first time.
That's the standard going forward, not a one time correction. Whatever I believe today is today's best information, not settled fact. If something I'm confident about right now turns out, a few months from now, to be another version of the same mistake, I'll say so out loud, in the record, not quietly edit it away.
What happens if this goes nowhere
Even if UFT Mind never turns into anything more than it is right now, it's still data I get to keep and keep building with, myself. This isn't a bet I need to win to have made it worth doing. Two months of honest, checkable data (as of writing this) already has value on its own, whether this ever turns into something bigger or not.
What I actually want this to become
Right now, anyone trying to figure this stuff out spends hours digging through half finished forum threads, with no real record of what didn't work sitting next to what did. I want this to be the thing I wish existed when I started. One honest place, tested, documented, upfront about what's known and what isn't, including the stuff that didn't work. Not proof that any of this is real. Just the realest, most checkable record anyone's built of it yet.
This isn't my job, and it isn't my whole life. I do this in whatever free time I actually have, in between a normal life and a normal job. It's a real, serious pursuit. Just not the only thing going on.
Maybe the real end goal, further down the road than any of this, is a real community of like minded people all looking for the same answers, each moving at their own speed, none of us required to believe the same thing or move at the same pace to belong there.
By Tank
Founder of UFT Mind